Saturday, February 11, 2023

49ers Offseason Primer - Internal Moves



By Scooter_McG

The 49ers 2022 season ended in about as disappointing fashion as possible, with the team never standing a chance in the NFCCG as they lost QB Brock Purdy on their opening drive to a torn UCL in his elbow, and backup QB Josh Johnson later to concussion. Now comes the long offseason as the team looks to reload in pursuit of another crack at the Super Bowl in 2023.

I'll be doing a series of posts on my thoughts on what I see as being the key decisions for the 49ers this offseason, broken down across key areas. Today I will be focusing on the coaching staff/ front office and the 49ers own free agents. 

Coaching Staff and Front Office  

This is already underway as some staff have departed and one hire has already been made. The headline departure from the team is standout DC DeMeco Ryans, who was hired as HC of the Texans. So far only one other assistant has been confirmed as following Ryans to the Texans - quality control coach Stephen Adegoke who will take up coaching the Texans DBs. However, offensive passing game coordinator Bobby Slowik is rumoured to be a candidate as Ryans OC, while defensive passing game specialist and DBs coach Cory Undlin's contract has been allowed to expire and may not be retained. The team also lost Director of Player Personnel Ran Carthon to the Titans GM role, while assistant head coach and RBs coach Anthony Lynn has also fielded interviews with other teams. 

The big hire so far is Steve Wilks to the vacated DC role, who did a nice job as interim HC of the Panthers this season. He will be tasked with maintaining a top-end defensive unit following the excellent contributions of Ryans and Saleh before him. As DBs expert it is also likely he has someone in mind to take over from Undlin and/ or provide his own assistance in coaching the unit up as needed. Importantly, Kris Kocurek has agreed to stay on as DL coach to support Wilks.

The key from here will be in keeping as much of the remaining staff in place as possible. It will be interesting to see whether the team looks to promote someone to the OC role (such as Slowik) to keep hold of them, in a similar vein as what they did with McDaniel. On the defensive side of the ball, I will be looking closely at who they bring in as the new defensive quality control coach, as I wouldn't be shocked if it was someone they see as having potential to be a future internal promotion to DC in a few years time.

Own Free Agents to Retain and Position Needs

The 49ers have 46 players currently under contract for the 2023 season, though that includes only 33 players that were on the active roster or IR at the end of the 2022 season. The good news is the bulk of the 49ers starters are under contract and it is mostly depth players that are coming off contract. 

Even so, there a number of UFAs of note, including: Jimmy Garoppolo, Jimmie Ward, Samson Ebukam, Emmanuel Moseley, Mike McGlinchey, Jake Brendel, Azeez Al-Shaair, Tashaun Gipson, Charles Omenihu, Robbie Gould, Dan Brunskill, Jordan Willis, Hassan Ridgeway, Kerry Hyder, Tarvarius Moore, Ross Dwelley, Tyler Kroft, Taybor Pepper and Jason Verrett. There's a lot of good players on that list, many of which were important contributors in 2022. 

Kevin Givens, Colton McKivitz and Demetrius Flannigan-Fowles are also RFAs, while Jauan Jennings is an ERFA, though each of those players should be fairly easy to retain. 

Looking at who is off contract, there are a couple of notable players and positions to keep an eye on:

  • OL: The OL was surprisingly good this season, in particular in pass protection. Brendel was something of a revelation at center, exceeding all expectations to the point where replacing him now seems a difficult task. It's difficult to predict what Brendel's market may be given he's already 30 and has only one year of starting experience in a system that is suited to his skillset. The 49ers should look to re-sign Brendel imo, though I suspect teams with a need at center that run zone heavy schemes will sniff around. Meanwhile, McGlinchey has been a mainstay on the right for much of the past five seasons, and while he has been known mainly for the couple of times a game he gets egregiously beaten, he has mostly been a solid starter with bouts of excellence in the run game. Contract predictors seem to believe he could be a fairly hot commodity and earn in the realm of $15M/annum. Brunskill has also been a reliable starter or backup for the team and for the right price I would be keen to see him brought back. There are some potential internal candidates to take over from these players. At center and OG, the 49ers drafted Nick Zakelj and signed UDFA Jason Poe last year, with both players getting some time training at center (mostly Zakelj). At RT, the team can easily re-sign RFA Colton McKivitz, who they held in high regard as potential future NFL OT in the 2020 draft, while they also have last season's swing OT Jaylon Moore that could complete for the job or potentially move RG Spencer Burford over. 
  • DL: Bosa and Armstead are the key cogs of the DL, but the vast majority of their supporting cast are off contract. Omenihu, Ebukam, Willis, Hyder, Ridgeway and Givens all did a good job providing depth and rotation (with Ebukam and Givens playing a lot of starter snaps) and ideally the bulk of these players would be brought back. Givens as a RFA should be fairly easy to retain, while Willis, Hyder and Ridgeway can probably be brought back relatively cheaply, but Omenihu and Ebukam could both see contracts in the realm of $10M/annum which may be a little too much for the 49ers to match. I'd probably let both seek greener pastures, but I do believe the 49ers have a need to strengthen the DT position and add 1 or 2 quality edge rushers to add to the mix. 
  • Safety/ Nickel: Talanoa Hufanga will lock down one starting safety spot following his breakout season, however, both Tashaun Gipson and Jimmie Ward are off contract leaving a hole at FS and nickel. George Odum is currently the only other safety on the roster with some starting experience, but he is more a STs specialist and the team should not go into the season with him pencilled in to compete for a starting job. At nickel, the 49ers draft Samuel Womack last year and while he struggled to get on the field this year I suspect it may be a similar case as with Lenoir where he comes back a better player following some rookie growing pains. The team also had a couple of players on the practice squad this year that they may be looking at to compete for jobs next season in Quantrezz Knight and Tayler Hawkins. For mine, Jimmie Ward is unlikely to be brought back unless for some reason no market eventuates for him (highly unlikely). Gipson meanwhile has made it known he will need some time away to decide on whether to retire or play on, though he did also say if he plays on he would want it to be with the 49ers. If I was the 49ers I would be keeping in close contact with Gipson and bring him back if he decides to play on. 
  • Outside CB: Emmanuel Moseley is another interesting name on the FA list who I am sure the team would love to bring back if they can. But the salary cap and emergence of Demo Lenoir may make that difficult. The 49ers have two starting calibre CBs in Ward and Lenoir, but you can never have too many. If Moseley's knee injury suppresses his market I'd be keen to re-sign him, but I suspect DeMeco Ryans (among other teams) will also be keen to bring him in and will likely price him out of the 49ers range. Jason Verrett is also a FA again, but I think it is time to call time on Verrett. Depth will need to be added at CB. 
  • QB: This one is pretty obvious - Jimmy Garoppolo will not be brought back. However, the injury to Purdy, and potential for his rehab to bleed into TC, means the team may need to think about brining in a vet QB as insurance.
  • STs: Two of the three specialists are off contract (Gould and Pepper). Of the two, Pepper will be the easiest decision. He's been excellent and can be retained cheaply, so I expect him to be brought back. Gould, however, could be more of a discussion. He's excellent, but he's also old and expensive. I suspect the team will bring him back, but a real conversation should be had about whether to go a different direction to save some cap space. 
Those are the areas I see as being most interesting to watch for the 49ers this offseason. Yes, other positions are also worth keeping an eye on, such as what they do at LB behind Warner and Greenlaw and backup TE. But realistically those will likely be filled by some combination of cheap FAs (potentially their own) and/ or mid to late draft picks. I doubt Al-Shaair will be back as he should be able to get a pretty decent contract somewhere else (say, the Texans?). 

So, in summary, aside from the RFAs/ ERFAs they have, I think Brendel and Gipson should be the main priority of their own players to retain. After that, unless guys like Moseley, Omenihu or Ebukam don't see much of a market and can be brought back fairly cheaply, I would then be focusing on some of their mid-tier depth pieces, in particular on their DL and Brunskill. 

I'm then seeing the following positions as being the key priorities for FA (i.e. other teams FAs) and the draft:

  • A good starting calibre DT
  • 1 or 2 good rotational DEs (ideally one that can be a good starter, though the team will also be expecting Drake Jackson to step up)
  • A RT to either be the clear cut starter (probably FA) or to compete (could be draft or FA)
  • A couple of outside CBs, one FA and one draft, to push Lenoir and compete for 3rd and 4th CB spots
  • A vet QB for insurance
  • A young LB to groom (#3 LB this year and eventual replacement for Greenlaw).

Creating Cap Space

Courtesy of the folks over at 49erscap.com, they are currently projecting that the 49ers have just shy of $10M in cap space for 2023 following the various adjustments post the 2022 season. 

That isn't a lot of room to manoeuvre and bring back the players I outlined above, or to sign any outside FAs plus their draft class. The 49ers will need find ways to bring their current cap liability for the 2023 season down. 

Looking at the players under contract I can't see anyone I would want to let go of to create space. Javon Kinlaw is pretty much the only player I believe isn't worth his contract right now, but his contract is fully guaranteed so the 49ers would save nothing by releasing him. However, if they could find someone to trade for him and take on his $2.7M base salary, I'd probably do it. 

One easy avenue to see the 49ers saving some 2023 cap space is through the extension of Nick Bosa. The 49ers will of course do everything in their power to make this happen this offseason, and Bosa seems quite content to stay with the 49ers, so it is hard to mimagine both sides not getting something done. Bosa currently counts for $17.9M against the 2023 cap, and while he will likely earn around double that per season on his new deal, they can also structure the deal to decrease the 2023 cap hit. The question then comes down to how much they want to push into future years. The problem the 49ers will face though is an extension for Bosa likely won't happen swiftly. Based on past experience we should expect this to get done late July/ early August, around the time training camp starts. So they can't rely on this cap space being made available ahead of FA.

I see two other obvious candidates for a restructure and possible extensions:

  • Christian McCaffrey. Much of his $12M base salary/ workout bonus can easily be converted to signing bonus to create cap space.
  • Charvarius Ward: Yes, he was only signed last off-season to a 3-year deal. But the deal only had a relatively modest signing bonus and large salaries in years 2 and 3. Given the quality of his play last season the 49ers should feel comfortable converting much of his $13.5M base salary to signing bonus, and potentially even consider an extension. 

The team could likely free up around $15M to $20M with the above three deals.

There is of course also the potential of restructuring some of their biggest stars on long term contracts, such as Trent Williams, Fred Warner, George Kittle and Arik Armstead (the four of which are currently slated to count the most against the 2023 cap). However, each of those players already has prorated signing/ restructure bonuses in excess of $5M per season, and pushing that higher also comes with undeniable future cap risks (see Ford, Dee). 

It is also worth mentioning that Aiyuk is also now eligible for a contract extension. However, I would be shocked if the 49ers agree to work out an extension with Aiyuk this offseason given they have the 5th year option for next season.

So that's my run down of the 49ers internal offseason moves. What do you agree or disagree with?

I will also be providing future articles on my thoughts about potential FA and draft targets, as I'm sure razor will be. So lots of fun discussions to be had coming up!  

59 comments:

  1. Holy Schnikes, Scooter. That took a lot of work. Great job and greatly appreciated.
    I would anticipate Brendell getting somewhere in the ball park of $6 million a year to stay on. I know Shanny really likes Zakelj and McKivitiz. I wonder if they give Brunny a look see at RT.
    I think Warner is another target for restructure
    I'd for sure draft another quarterback like Bennett for instance on day 3
    A LB I like to replace Al-Shaair is , Daiyon Henley from Washington in round 3. Raw but has all the tools to suceed in this defense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks razor!

      Brendel for $6M I think is fine to re-sign.

      I like the idea of drafting a LB with one of their 3rd rounders. It's a position you can more commonly find good value around there.

      In terms of QB, I was thinking a vet, but maybe draft is as good a route. Realistically though whoever it is will be QB3 barring injury.

      Delete
  2. Only on the cheap, my suggestion for a third string QB is Mullens or CJ then draft one maybe even two, the Niners seem to go through them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scooter
    Try as I might, I can't find anything I disagree about!
    * Even though I know the data doesn't support me, I am not a fan of Brendel at Center! IMO. he's a downgrade from Alex Mack. I'd like a
    center that can better handle the power of a defensive NT.
    Something Old Coach, on Jack Hammers blog, brought up: Chase
    Young is on the trading block. Should the 9ers make a run at him If healthy? He and Bosa would be a nightmare for other NFL teams.
    Chase Young is on the trading block. After sitting out most of the last two years, the 9ers shouldn't have to give up too much to get him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks GEEP.

      If the Commanders make Chase Young available via trade the 49ers have to test out what it would cost to get him. Despite the injuries, the talent is undeniable. But I imagine a lot of teams would be interested and the 49ers aren't in the best position draft picks wise to make it happen. But... they do have the existing relationship with Mayhew which helps.

      Delete
    2. Geep, what would you offer to get him?

      Delete
    3. Razor
      I have trouble answering the question until I know which of the 9er F/A they resign. 9ers could use in a sign and trade deal?
      * If possible, I'd try to resign 9er F/A's the the other team ask for by name and not give up any 3rd rd draft picks.
      * If it come to trading a starter, Who saves the the most in salary cap and have their production replaced by another player. McGlinchey, Jimmy Ward and maybe Azeez Al-Shaair would be my top candidates?





      Delete
    4. GEEP, correct me if I am wrong, but are you suggesting trading McG, Ward or Al-Shaair? If so, bad news - they are all FAs.

      Delete
    5. Scooter
      I'm suggesting they resign a 9er free agent(s) Washington wants and they can then use to trade for for Chase young

      Delete
    6. Ooooh.... that's a bad bit of business. Bad faith signings. They should never sign a UFA and trade them immediately - it negates the player's ability to choose their destination. If they want to play for the Commanders, and the Commanders want those players, they can just sign for them. Start doing that sort of practice and players will take notice and stop signing for you.

      Not to mention it just adds cap hit to the 49ers unnecessarily.

      Delete
    7. Scooter
      IF YOU NOTICED: My original response to Razor was...."I have trouble answering the question until I know which of the 9er F/A they resign." Apparently I'm not making it clear?
      My point being, the 9ers trade a free agent they had already resigned and NOT "a bad bit of business" or a "Bad faith signing(s)."

      Delete
    8. Would either of you trade Lance for Young?

      Delete
    9. GEEP, your previous post you said "re-sign a 9er free agent(s) Washington wants and they can then use to trade for for Chase young". Seems to suggest the goal in that situation for re-signing the player is for their trade value.

      Delete
    10. Razor
      "Would either of you trade Lance for Young?"
      * YES, If he checks out medically and renumeration demands are reasonable. IMO, the 9er FO would be remiss if they failed to try.

      Delete
    11. Duly noted, Geep. I'll go on record as a no. I think I want to hold both for 2 years and see what happens, meanwhile drafting another day 3 prospect at the position. Who knows how long Griese is going to be around. Might as well give him another student.

      Delete
    12. Missed this question earlier. I am with you, razor. Hold onto both Lance and Purdy. Only way I'd trade Lance for Young is if the Commanders came calling and were offering say a 1st rounder and change on top of Young.

      Delete
    13. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    14. Nah, you keep Trey and give him every opportunity to succeed this year, its time for him to S or the Niners will get off the pot. He's too cheap not to keep and see if all his measurables measure up. He reminds me a lot of Steve "Air" McNair, and when you look at McNairs first 2 years the guy started 6 games and played in 13, his 3rd year is when he finally played all 16, granted they went 8-8 but that could be as much a team issue as it is him. But they are similar, Steve could run, had some 400 and 500 yard seasons but the 2nd half of his career that dropped to barely over 100 yards rushing a year, but when you watch his highlights he was moved around a lot, rolled out, clean passing lanes, this is how Trey will succeed.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsCcjb21H5Y

      Another dude who Trey should model his career after is McNabb.

      Be mobile but not a run first dude. He has to prove it to Kyle but if Trey spends the next 6 months nose in the playbook, watching film and working on his reads, recognition and timing that will be how he can best grow, he doesn't need to work on his physical tools its all mental with Trey at this point.

      It would be foolish of the niners to trade him without knowing what they have, and thinking Brock is a legit qb in the league. Flash in the pans happen, we witnessed it here in 2012-2014. Miami "wrecked the league" with the wildcat in 2008 going 11-5, 1st in the AFC East...the next year the league caught on and they were 7-9 and 3rd in the AFC East. Brock was great this year, but coming back from injury and an offseason for DC to study tape (these guys don't like being embarrassed by the last pick in the draft) and who knows if Brock is who we saw this year or they show why he was the last guy drafted.

      Keep Trey, theyll need him.

      Delete
    15. EMJay, I agree with you re Lance. They should keep both him and Purdy this year and let them fight it out to be the long term starter.

      McNair is also exactly the comparison I have made for Lance previously.

      If you read twitter comments, etc, it feels like there is a large contingent of 49er fans ready to give up on Lance. I don't get it. He's done nothing wrong other than be unfortunate with injury. The way I see it is we should be excited to have two young QBs with talent that are on cheap contracts with no need to let one go.

      Delete
    16. And its so weird that these guys were, 12 months ago, constantly tweeting how Trey was going to "wreck the league" and be an MVP candidate. I pushed back on a lot of them saying just let the kid be, don't throw these lofty expectations on him because if he didn't do exactly as they had boasted they'd turn on him, and we see that. I still believe thats how we need to approach this season, clean slate, no expectations other than to make more good plays than bad and not be the reason the team loses a game.

      All that aside, the Niners need to figure out why they started so crappy the last two seasons and avoid that this year, be it Trey or Brock as the QB. Go out, go 3-1 in September, none of this getting to Nov 1st and being 3-5 or 4-4 nonsense.

      Delete
    17. Oh yes, fast start next season should be one of the team's key goals. Give themselves a chance at the #1 seed.

      Delete
  4. Four more days till 2-year anniversary for this blog. Time flies for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's goes Slowic. Time to promote Kubiak/Fluery and bring in another ambitious quality control guy cuz I don't see this ever ending as long as Shanny wants to coach

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Razor / anyone
      Do the 9ers get a comp pick for Slowic? Does anyone know the rule(s) for determining if a team gets a comp pick?

      Delete
    2. GEEP,

      As far as I know, we get comp picks for coach staff, only if they are a) minority diversity and b) they get the top most coaching (HC) or GM job.

      So Slowic will not count for any comp picks.

      Delete
    3. Big loss, Shanahan had been grooming him. Kubiak will likely get a promotion.

      Delete
    4. We get nothing but a promise to do us a service one day, lol.

      Delete
  6. I don't even think Walsh's staff got poached as bad as this one. In 50 years of football, I'm not aware of this much turnover due to success year after year.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now Deebo says James Bradberry is trash.

    I don't understand why these guys shoot their mouth off. We come off as sore losers. What happened happened. Move on.

    I would rather we channel the anger and train well/get a championship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Turns out, Deebo was right, lol.

      Delete
    2. Lol! He was right, but he shouldn't have aired it out.

      Champions play the game a certain way. No place for this IMHO.

      Delete
  8. Well done Scooter- I think there needs to be talk of Bosa and Aiyuk's status at the top ....... I would entertain doing a long-term deal w Bosa, something in the 6 yr realm, if it made sense w the salary cap. I agree w DT being a need and the fact that Kinlaw likely isn't the answer, but we'll see how next year goes. I also think they should look to be able to shift to a power run game with the staple of RB's and possible issues at QB- and they need a vet 3rd QB

    ReplyDelete
  9. Eagles are now about to be in world of hurt trying to keep a SB calibre roster together. A lot of key players off contract, especially on defense, Hurts up for a big extension, and little in the way of cap space.

    This is where you have to appreciate the 49ers approach. SB calibre team they can maintain.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Scooter
    To your point: Eagles 2023 free agents and their Market Value:
    https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/philadelphia-eagles/
    Any of the Eagles F/A you would like the 9ers to try to sign?

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Scooter If the 9ers signed Eagles FA Andre Dillard, they could let OT McGlinchey walk and save money.
      The Eagles are reportedly willing to trade Dillard for a 3rd rd draft pick. The No. 22 overall pick in the 2019 Draft, Dillard has been relegated to backup after losing the starting job to Jordan Mailata.

      Delete
    2. Dillard is also a FA, so no need to trade anything to the Eagles for him.

      If the 49ers let McGlinchey go he is a guy the 49ers should consider. But my understanding is run blocking isn't his forte.

      Delete
    3. Aside from Dillard, most of the guys that could be of interest will likely get contracts well above what the 49ers are likely to want to budget for.

      But one guy I would keep an eye on is Brandon Graham, if he decides to play on. Still productive but probably won't cost a lot.

      Delete
    4. We know Shanny puts a premium on LT, C and RT.

      Delete
    5. One of the most important aspects of a good oline is continuity, I don't see the niners making major changes across that front, especially as the unit played better as the season went on.

      McG seems to also be very open to coming back to SC, and he's a organization favorite. I think they work a deal, 4 years 45M.

      Also seem them getting something done with Brendel, can't imagine he would want to go looking around since he's bounced around for so long and actually seems to have found a place to be a starter.

      Wouldn't be surprised to see them draft a tackle and a guard/center in the mid rounds to develop but feels like they've drafted/udfa multiple oline for the last few drafts (Banks, Burford, Moore, McKivitz, Zakelj, Poe, Watson, Gutierrez, Ismail) and outside of spot duty for Moore & McKivitz, and 1st year starting for Bands and Burford, the rest are unknown so time for a few of these guys to step up to solid backup roles. They'll definitely grab atleast one Oline in the draft &/or udfa but unless they lose Brendal or McGlinchey they probably won't invest heavily in that group and spend capital on dline since they're losing a lot of guys from that group.

      Delete
    6. McGlinchey will leave for north of $15 million because that's what the going rate is right now.

      My too early OL prediction, Williams/Banks/Zakelj/Brunny/Burford

      Delete
  12. This kid, Calijah Kancey outta Pittsburg is intriguing but his measurables are terrible. He could be a perfect 3t penetrator in this scheme or he could be another Solomon Thomas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Razor
      RE DT Calijah Kancey, Pittsburgh:
      You're correct, his measurements aren't good, but he's also a mid Rd #2 draft pick (CBS / NFL) has his listed as number 47.
      I don't see the 9ers moving up in the draft for him?

      What's your opinion of John Mitchel Schmitz, Center, Minnesota? CBS / NFL lists him at #73

      Delete
  13. So the Eagles have also lost both their OC and DC, on top of having a lot of good players heading to FA. Looks like they shot their shot, and missed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, let's see how well they cope retooling like we do every year.

      Delete
  14. Rumour is 49ers will be promoting TE coach Fleury to be OC (obviously not calling plays though). Good way to keep an up and coming coach you don't want to lose for a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Leroy Watson, a former TE on the practice squad with 35" arms and played with both Burford and Poe in college, and also at high school with Poe at FB. Could he be ready to compete for RT?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're putting a lot of faith in a guy having to move from TE to RT at the highest level with no game experience...will make McG look like Trent in comparison.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I asked if he might be ready to compete. I still think Burford has the best shot at winning RT.

      Delete
    4. If they don't decide to bring in a clear cut starter in FA or via trade, then Watson should be one of many guys expected to compete.

      Agree that Burford would likely be expected to win any such competition. Moore and McKivitz also in the mix. I would probably also add a lower cost FA to the competition (if they aren't signing a clear cut starter) plus a draft pick. Important position to get right, so if you don't have a clear cut starter you want to throw a few darts to increase the chance one hits.

      Delete
  16. Klint Kubiak has been hired to replace Slowik

    ReplyDelete
  17. Joe Tippmann outta Wisconsin is interesting in the 3rd round but I'd draft him to compete at RT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting. Probably need to trade up for him. I think I would leave him as an IOL, but like him.

      Delete

2024 Season Schedule

           Week1- Win                         Week 10- Win Week 2 - Win                        Week 11- Loss Week 3 - Win                   ...