27 - A) WR Texas A&M K C Concepcion B) WR Washington Denzel Boston
58 - A) LG Georgia Tech Keylan Rutledge B) LG Iowa Gennings Dunker
*Dee Winters traded to Tennessee for pick 184
127 - DL Texas A&M Tyler Onyedim
133 - RB Penn St Nick Singleton
138 - S Oklahoma Robert Spears-Jennings
139 - Edge Western Michigan Nadame Tucker
184 - OG/C/OT Washington Carver Willis
I don't believe there will be a team willing to trade up to 27
I don't believe more than 5 WR's come off the board before 27 and I have the 49ers taking the 5th or 6th
One of Rutledge or Dunker should be available at 58 and ideally starts at LG
Onyedim has experience at 0t through 7t and can set the edge at DE, likely backup to Osa as their 3t penetrator
Singleton is a one cut and go runner they'd likely have on their board who brings some physicality
RSJ is a big speedy Safety that can tackle who Morris might have interest in
Tucker is their speed rusher who they can integrate on obvious passing situations
Willis is a perfect prototype for this scheme. A run blocking savant who can move and play everywhere along the OL
Nice work razor. Could very well go this way.
ReplyDeleteMy main concern with this sort of draft would be the pass rush would still be heavily reliant on Bosa and Osa.
Thanks Scooter. Most difficult draft to predict since we've been doing them together.
DeleteRazor, so at 58 you didn't believe there was a DPR worthy of taking there? Just curious.
ReplyDeleteYes, nice work.
DeleteI think they prioritize the LG over DPR.
Delete13 QB sacks in 25 indicates that help is a relevant necessity. If Tucker is the answer, that certainly works for me. But drafting him at 139 almost comes as an afterthought.
ReplyDeleteOpen question: What do people think about trading for Highsmith as a DPR, if he's available and affordable?
ReplyDeleteIf all it costs is say a 4th and Aiyuk then absolutely. Or if it's a trade involving Mac Jones and the 49ers get a draft pick back as well, then sure.
DeleteComes down to what they are trying to achieve through the draft. I think a few people in the media are incorrectly assuming they are "all in" on 2026 and so will be focused on adding immediate impact through the 2026 draft picks. With that mindset, adding Highsmith makes sense.
Imo, they used FA to provide the immediate impact and will use the draft for future impact. And as a result I don't think they'll look to add Highsmith unless the cost is low.