Sunday, February 21, 2021

Resign Trent Williams? Not so fast!

MidWestDynasty
February 21, 2021


If you haven't heard, the expected salary cap for the 2021 NFL season is at or a little higher than $180 million.  Because of this cap, the 49ers are going to have several choices to make to keep under the salary cap while also making sure the 2020 season was merely a blip in regards to the team's ability to be competitive in the difficult NFC West division and the league as a whole.  One vital decision the team needs to make is whether to resign LT Trent Williams.  If you take a gander at many arguments surrounding this decision, the overall consensus is the team should resign Williams.  However, I think this would be a big mistake by the 49ers, and here's why.

HIS AGE

By the time the 2021 regular season begins, Trent Williams will be 33 years old, so there is a valid question of how much he has left in the tank. 
Don't get me wrong; I would love to see Williams continue to play until he feels ready to hang up his cleats, but the reality is that offensive tackles tend to start to decline around his age due to the wear and tear they experience as a member of the offensive line.  Joe Mahoney of SB Nation wrote an article that covers this topic, and it can be read at https://www.milehighreport.com/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl.  Williams could buck the trend by continuing to play at a high level, but the odds are stacked against him.

HIS INJURY HISTORY

This is a list of the known injuries or illnesses Williams has dealt with since he entered the league:

- Concussion
- Strained MCL
- Thigh
- Knee
- Cancerous growth on the head
- COVID-19
- Elbow
- Thumb

There is probably more to add to that list, but Williams has a penchant for playing through pain, which is essentially a double-edged sword.  On the one hand, it's good that he is not willing to pull himself off the field; on the other hand, doing so can open the player up to other injuries which can shorten his career or cause him to miss games which in turns results in leaving the blind side of the QB to a backup or a fill-in.  Yikes.

HIS ASKING PRICE

A while back, it was reported that Williams was wanting to test his value on the free-agent market after some contract discussions with the 49ers front office.  So what his value on the market?  Despite his age and injury history, Williams is considered to be one of the best LTs currently playing in the NFL, so there is a strong likelihood that he will be paid as such, and that alone could most likely eliminate any realistic chance the 49ers have at resigning Williams. 
Consider this:  According to spotrac.com, the highest average for a LT belongs to David Bakhtiari of the Green Bay Packers at $23 million.  If Williams wants around that or more, then the 49ers should move on from Williams because they are not going to be able to match or beat out the competition that may have more money to burn unless they make some big sacrifices.  Besides, if that occurs...

THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS

It isn't the end of the world if the 49ers are unable to sign Williams.  The 49ers have some decent options available to replace Williams in the draft or free agency. 
For instance, in free agency, the team could sign Alejandra Villanueva, a linesman who isn't of the same caliber as Williams but has done fairly well at the position with the Steelers and is more of a stalwart at staying off the injury list than Williams has.
Or the team could draft a LT in the first or second round of the draft. The LT position has good depth at it this year, with prospects like Dillon Radunz and Christian Darrisaw being good options to take with the 12th pick and others like Alex Leatherwood or Liam Eichenberg being suitable second-round choices.
And then you have the trade avenue.  Orlando Brown Jr. of the Baltimore Ravens recently stated that he wants to remain at LT because that is where he feels the most comfortable at -and his play in 2020 easily backs up that boast-, but the problem is the Ravens already have a LT they just paid in Ronnie Stanley.  The only reason Brown was given a chance at the position after playing at RT for his first couple of seasons was due to a severe ankle injury Stanley sustained in the Week 8 match-up against the Steelers.  But because of that, the Ravens have a potential controversy brewing.
This is where the 49ers come into the equation because they could trade their first-round pick for this year and the next to the Ravens in exchange for Brown or Stanley. 
Of the two players, Brown is the better option of the two because he will be in the final year of his rookie contract, giving the 49ers the money needed to address other areas on the team; it will also put the 49ers in the position to pay him next off-season when the salary cap is expected to go up more.
That said, the 49ers also could not go wrong with acquiring Stanley who has excelled as a premiere pass blocking LT on a team primarily built to run the football.  Sound familiar?

THERE ARE OTHER AREAS TO ADDRESS

If the 49ers do meet the contract demands of Williams, the team faces a strong likelihood of not fielding a Super Bowl contender.  Yeah, that may sound overly dire, but how else can you describe a situation in regards to a team who needs a FB, C, LCB, RCB, NCB, slot receiver, edge rusher, and depth at WR and TE?  Oh, and the impending need to extend Warner; we can't forget about that, can we?  I don't think the 49ers will want to have a rookie playing at each of those positions, so unless the 49ers hit a home run digging through the bargain bins, there is no way the team could address even some of those needs while paying what Williams believes he is worth.

BONUS - THE DEE FORD CONUNDRUM

In recent weeks, there has been a growing dilemma of the 49ers having to pay Dee Ford $11.6 million if he is still on their roster by April due to a clause in his contract.  That is because there has been little to no indication Ford will be 100% healthy by then.  If that scenario comes to be, then there will be almost no chance of the 49ers retaining Williams.

CONCLUSION

There are several reasons why resigning Williams would be an error in decision-making.  They range from his age and health to their being cheaper options.  Then you have to factor in needing to fill other positional vacancies and keeping some key playmakers happy.  All in all, the 49ers would be better off in letting another team pay Williams his value.


18 comments:

  1. I dunno, Mid he just earned his 3rd PFF award for Highest Graded OT for the year at 92. Looks to me like he could play until he's 36. If the 49ers really want him they can make it work by making it so he only counts for around $11 million this year and still sign him to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are two counterpoints to this. The first one is his age and health could make the contract another albatross the team does not need. The second counterpoint is the recent comments from Williams that he wants to see what his worth is, so if he does hit the free-agent market, there are several teams who could easily pay him more than what the 49ers can or are willing to.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For mine it really just comes down to the $$ he is willing to take to stay with the 49ers. If it becomes a bidding war, let him go. But at anything less than $20M a year I'm interested, and at $15M a year its "just get it done".

    Personally I think it will be a bidding war and he'll be gone.

    In terms of replacements, not sure why Villanueva has become so popular as an option. He's an average at best run blocker on one of the worst run blocking units in the NFL. That seems at odds with what Shanahan wants at OT. If they don't re-sign Williams I think the draft is the most logical place to find a replacement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is your take on the team potentially acquiring Ronnie Stanley or Orlando Brown Jr. from the Ravens in a trade?

      Delete
    2. Yep, I fully expect them to draft an OT with their 1st rounder if they don't sign, Williams. That is unless they saw something in, McKivitz or Coleman. Remember, Lynch said they planned on taking, McKivitz in round 4, which was their plan b. They were elated to get him in round 5 and said they believe he can play OT.

      Delete
    3. Mid, that all depends on what the Ravens want in return. Stanley would be great but I doubt the Ravens will trade him. Brown... is he a fit for this offense? If he can be had cheap then sure, but I doubt it.

      Razor, they clearly believed the deal for Williams was going to happen. The talk about McKivitz was in some part talking him up - I doubt they really felt comfortable with him playing LT last year. And I doubt that has changed. So if they lose Williams I would be shocked if they don't draft an OT early.

      Delete
    4. Razor and Scooter, I agree that the 49ers will most likely take an OT if Williams signs elsewhere. However, Shanahan and Lynch have tended to do things that have surprised the fans before, so I think every possibility should be kept on the table.

      Delete
    5. Yep, I'm not meaning to sound like I am ruling anything out Mid. Trading for a vet option may indeed be exactly what they look to do if they can't re-sign Williams. Just like they did last year in trading for Williams.

      But... outside of Brown who I don't believe is a fit, not sure who will be available via trade. And it is a really strong OL class in the draft. I would be very surprised if that isn't the route they take if they lose Williams.

      Delete
    6. I agree on all fronts Scooter.

      This is offtopic, but have you thought about joining Razor and me by contributing to the blog? I enjoy reading your posts because of how informative and thorough they are, and I feel like your articles would be just as good of a read.

      Delete
    7. Thanks Mid. Yes, I have been meaning to mention to razor I am happy to be a contributor. Just haven't gotten round to emailing him yet.

      Delete
  4. Nice write up Mid.

    I believe that the Niners without a doubt feel they have a nucleolus of a team to contend for the playoffs. I also believe that JG is going to be the opening day QB. With those two thoughts I don't see the Niners going with a rookie LT. I like Williams and he is a good fit but not at a ridiculous price. When Orlando Brown first came up I mentioned him and I believe it was Razor who questioned the fit. I don't know the answer to that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Good writeup, Mid. But did you really mean to write that the 49ers should be willing to give up two first-round picks for either one of the Raven OTs??!

    "This is where the 49ers come into the equation because they could trade their first-round pick for this year and the next to the Ravens in exchange for Brown or Stanley. "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for reading it Cubus. I think it depends on which OT the 49ers would want, but I could see the 49ers be willing to trade two first-round picks for one of those guys. Probably Stanley because he was a Pro Bowler in 2019.

      Delete
  6. Mid, yes a very good writeup. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mid,
    Good read.
    Anything above 18m would be off the table for me.
    As good as Williams is, his football shelf life may start to diminish in one or two years.
    I'm for drafting a couple of OLmen in the draft.
    Unless we go with Slater at 12, we could trade down for Darrishaw or another top OL player.

    I understand the argument of signing Williams because we may still be in the window of a SB run. But, if we don't make it to the SB this coming season we will miss out on some top tier OL players in this draft.
    Passing on players like Slater or Darrishaw could hurt a couple of years down the road.

    ReplyDelete

Best Supporting Cast

NFL ranks in "Supporting Cast Rating" in terms of average team PFF rush, receiving, pass blocking and run blocking grades (everyth...