Friday, January 3, 2025

Paying Purdy

 

By Scooter_McG

The 49ers will have a number of areas to address this offseason, but none more pressing or important than sorting out what to do with Brock Purdy. While Purdy has played at an exceptionally high level to start his career – by almost any metric his stats over the first three years of his career are as good and better than anyone not named Mahomes – there is no denying the level of his play faltered in 2024 as the supporting cast was not as strong around him. The idea of paying him at or above current top of the QB market no longer seems reasonable in the eyes of most parties, despite many predicting that would be the case heading into the 2024 season.

I have been playing around with some potential extension contract amounts and structures to see to help my own understanding of the potential ramifications on the 49ers salary cap. And what surprised me during this exercise was that it’s possible to hand out a pretty big contract without completely ruining the 49ers cap situation.

I asked in the previous post what people would be willing to pay Purdy as a share of the 49ers cap, and Razor was kind enough to reply with 12%. This was along the lines of what I was thinking as well, at 12.5%. Doing a little bit of research, this seems to be in the ball park of what Super Bowl winning QBs not on rookie contracts have comprised of the cap in the past.

To understand what this means in terms of dollars it is necessary to project the salary cap forward over the likely life of Purdy’s deal. Current projections to 2027 (https://overthecap.com/nfl-and-nflpa-look-forward-to-the-future-salary-cap#google_vignette) indicate around $272.2M in 2025, $298.2M in 2026 and $328.2M in 2027. I have assumed the cap then continues to increase by $30M per annum thereafter.

For the purposes of this exercise I am assuming the team decides to give Brock a five year extension (i.e., he would be under contract for the next six seasons, adding five years to his remaining one year on his rookie deal). The money he is given would also be additional to the existing $1.1M he is already scheduled to make for 2025 on his rookie deal, while also having $19,200 in pro-rated signing bonus due next against the 2025 cap that will also remain.  

Over the next six years, based on my cap projections this would sum to $2,063.2M in total cap per team – 12% of this would equate to around $247.5M while 12.5% would be around $258M. This sets a ballpark for what our extension amount should be if we want to achieve 12% to 12.5% of the salary cap. However, it is also important to remember we can use void years to pro-rate option bonuses to push some cap hits into future years beyond the six years of the deal, and thereby add additional money to the deal while still aiming to hit our goal of 12% to 12.5%. For this exercise I have decided to look at a 5-year extension paying Purdy an additional $280M (i.e., under contract for 6 years to 2030, paying $281.1M over those 6 years). I’m also going to add two void years at the end of the deal.

For the new money, I’ve decided to go with the following bonus structure, while paying $100M in new salary over the life of the deal.


Below is a summary of the yearly cash, cap hits and percent of total salary cap by year based on this structure.


Of note, I have decided in this example to keep his cap hit below 12% for the first four years, then letting it increase to just under 15% in years 5 and 6. By year 5 the team will know whether they want to keep committing to Purdy and would likely restructure/ extend his deal or let him go at this point.

This is just one potential structure and there are many ways they could go about this. The main thing this highlighted to me was that it’s possible to give Purdy a big deal (above the likes of Tua, Love and Lawrence) while still keeping it at a level that shouldn’t preclude the team from maintaining a strong roster around him.

The only caveat with the above though is that you have to commit to Purdy for at least another 3 years, and likely 4 – anything less and the dead cap hit will likely be too onerous to get out from. 


29 comments:

  1. That looks like a page right out of the Marathe playbook and a fine example of a deal that works for both parties. Nice picture of Brock too! Thanks Scooter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks razor. Now let's hope Purdy is reasonable and isn't looking to reset the market.

      Delete
    2. Scooter,
      If you don't mind me asking, what do/did you do for a living? You certainly have a penchant for numbers. I hope i'm wrong but I just don't see BP giving the 49ers a team friendly deal. Maybe if he sticks around for a 3rd contract but not now.

      Delete
    3. OC, I am an economic consultant by trade, mainly building economic models.

      I think Purdy will get an extension paying somewhere between $55M and $60M per year in new money. Basically market rate, but not resetting the market.

      Delete
    4. @Scooter: I suppose I don't need to ask, but all dollar figures in the spreadsheet are in millions, correct? With your analysis, what is the guaranteed money? Further, if you were the GM and Purdy wasn't performing which year would you pick to move on from him (assuming that you had the freedom to do so)?

      Delete
    5. Also, Scooter, help me out. How did you come up with the per year cap hit. If you don't mind pick a year (say 2027) and explain how the cap hit was determined. I tried, but am not getting the same numbers you are.

      Delete
    6. Hey cubus, I will answer the 2nd comment first.

      In 2027 the cap hit equals his salary ($12.5m) + pro rated signing bonus ($12m) + pro rated 2026 option bonus ($6m) + pro rated 2027 option bonus ($6m) = $36.5m cap hit.

      Delete
    7. @Scooter: I think I figured out how you came up with the cap hit. So for 2027, for example, the cap hit is equal to the $12M per year signing bonus cap hit, the $6M per year Option 1 cap hit, the $6M per year Option 2 cap hit and the new money of $12.5M. That totals $36.5M which is the total cap hit that you show for 2027. Did I get that right?

      Delete
    8. Re your first comment, by guaranteed I imagine you mean fully guaranteed at signing, and I would imagine all cash paid in Year 1 and 2 would be fully guaranteed at signing, and some of year 3. So somewhere between $130m and $150m.

      The earliest you could realistically get out of this would be after the 2027 season.

      Delete
    9. And your reason for saying "realistically get out of this" is because of the fully guaranteed money at signing. If he is guaranteed basically through 2027 (year 3) as you say, you might as well keep him on the roster even if he performed so badly that he becomes a backup (and assuming that you can't trade him).

      Delete
    10. Pretty much. That would also be the point where you would see cap savings from moving him, so long as you designate it a post June 1 release.

      Delete
  2. Sorry, one more question. What is meant by an "option" bonus and what are the conditions for paying the bonus?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Option bonuses are similar to signing bonuses but trigger in future years. And like signing bonuses they are pro rated over the remaining years of the deal.

      What triggers them is usually being on a roster at a certain date.

      Delete
    2. Scooter,
      Great breakdown.

      Delete
  3. Personally, I doubt BP is going to rape the Niner Organization. I have zero idea about what he is worth. I think BP is smart enough to know his limitations and needs quality behind him in order to be really successful. I wouldn't be surprised if he came up with an unorthodox contract that paid him very well but left room to sign talent. He may even request that certain monies are committed to the signing of talent in his contract. The thing is, and I have said this before, how many millions does one need anyhow? Takes a complete team to compete and you need money to do that. If the QB takes up so much and leaves little to sign talent, then he becomes more of a problem. Only a few QBs deserve top dollar and he isn't one of them, yet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ozzy Trapilo, RT, Boston College is another I like a lot.

    ReplyDelete

  5. Scooter
    Thanks for the BP salary cap break down. Like cubus, I also had questions, but your explanations to cubus and the 12% answered
    them. And like undercenter, I hope BP is reasonable, the 9ers have a great 2025 draft and they're once again SB contenders.
    QUESTION: If you don't mind me asking, when you build economic models," do you employ six sigma methodology to minimize defects and waste? As an example, "Cause and Effect Diagram" to pinpoint critical factors impacting economic outcomes within a model.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Six Sigma is more for large scale product development. Most of the models I build are bespoke, for internal use, or aren't sufficiently complex to warrant such detail, so it's more a case of implementing the principles, which is just best practice.

      Delete
  6. @Scooter: Looks like Kurtenbach agrees with you regarding DT being the biggest need. He says it has been since Buckner left.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/dieter-kurtenbach-the-49ers-biggest-off-season-need-it-s-been-the-same-for-five-years/ar-AA1wW6yX?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=ed78d0bc2d284d1589558201153491e0&ei=40

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll need to check that out - I have a lot of time for Dieter.

      For the D to get back to top 5 levels it largely comes down to the DL. Have to be able to stop the run to create 3rd and long and need to be able to rush the passer with four. DT is the bigger weakness than DE in this equation right now (though an upgrade opposite Bosa wouldn't hurt).

      Delete
  7. I agree with Scooter that Purdy will get between $55 and $60 million. Purdy and his agent are going to ask for what they think he is worth on the open market, just like every other player and probably each of us in our personal lives. It’s not a matter of greed or why do I need this much money, it’s a matter of fairness and self worth. The Niners will likely offer something lower than that and then negotiations begin. The final number is unlikely to be too far off what he believes he’s worth in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Felix,
    I'm thinking the same way. I only hope that there isn't a drawn out negotiation that will effect the new season. Unlike the past few years the 49ers will have a longer off season and time to heal. Purdy and the team will be anxious to prove that the season was a complete outlier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Getting it locked down by the start of FA would be ideal.

      Delete
  9. Who were the two players who split time at RT last week? They didn't look bad. Maybe we can get lucky and fall into a quality OT. It is about time we get a little good luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlie Heck and Austen Pleasants
      Link to 9ers roster:
      https://www.49ers.com/team/players-roster/

      Delete
  10. This was a great article Scooter, and It seems very realistic... I could also see SF giving a bit more money up front in order to manage it on the backend a bit more (either outs or less money). Also Paraag loves to give injury guarentees rather than real guarenteed money, so it will be interesting to see how that lands.
    Interestingly, I think SF could get to near 60M AAV without it hurting their cap situation too much, though I would certainly hope to get it closer to 50M.

    ReplyDelete

Due Diligence

  49ers have area scout Ryan Kessenich at CGSAllstar's , watching OL and DL here.